Drug Policy Alliance Logo
About Take Action News Publications and Library Blog Contact Donate Events Community eStore
Home > News > Press Room > Press Releases > Washington State Supreme Court Rules Random Drug Testing Violates Students’ Constitutional Rights  
News News

Right Side Donate
4px Padding
Conference 2007 Archive

Marijuana: The Facts
What's Wrong With the Drug War?
Safety First: Parents, Teens and Drugs
Drug By Drug
State By State
Reducing Harm: Treatment and Beyond
Drugs, Police & the Law
Communities Affected
Drug Policy Around the World
Publications and Library
What People are Talking About

Your Email
> Manage Subscriptions
What People are Talking About

Join the Drug Policy Alliance's work to promote drug policies based on science, compassion, health, and human rights.
Donate
> Get Involved
In this Section
bottom
The Latest
No More Marijuana Arrests

Send A Message
Full Text Resources

> more

Suggested Web sites
> more links

  

Washington State Supreme Court Rules Random Drug Testing Violates Students’ Constitutional Rights
For Immediate Release: Thursday, March 13, 2008. Contact: Jennifer Kern (415) 373-7694 or Tamar Todd (510) 229-5213

The Washington State Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Wahkiakum School District’s random drug testing policy is unconstitutional and violates student athletes’ rights under the higher privacy protections of article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution.

The Drug Policy Alliance and the Washington Education Association (WEA) filed an amicus curiae (friend-of-the-court) brief in the case arguing that random student drug testing is unsupported by scientific research, may deter students from participating in extracurricular activities, undermines trust in student-teacher relationships while creating a hostile school environment and may evoke oppositional behavior in students who may try to “beat” the test, among other concerns.

“The Washington State Supreme Court should be praised for making a principled decision based on the state’s constitution that random student drug testing is a serious and unwarranted intrusion by the state on the bodies and privacy of students,” said Jennifer Kern, research associate with the Drug Policy Alliance. “The decision, while grounded in constitutional principles, is all the stronger for coinciding with good public policy. Random student drug testing is ineffective, unreliable and counterproductive. Such programs waste valuable resources and distract from developing proven interventions that prevent and reduce harmful drug use by students.”

In a concurring opinion, Associate Justice Madsen cited the public policy objections to testing raised in the amicus brief, stating, “As pointed out by the Washington Education Association and Drug Policy Alliance in their amicus brief, drug testing may actually be counterproductive, as participation in athletic activities is itself an important factor in discouraging drug use and the drug testing program may actually discourage such participation, isolating students from healthy activities.”

The ACLU of Washington represented the parents and students in the Wahkiakum School District.



Provide Feedback on this Page:

* 1.




 2.



 3.



   Please leave this field empty